Rh Bill & Malthusian Theory Essay

In 2011, we squander straight off vii billion people living in this planet. Unfortunately, Earths estimated carrying cogency is still ab bring out eleven to twelve billion people. With such a big problem we atomic number 18 facing today, it is important to analyze and visualise what the scholars of the past make believe to say of our increasing community. One of the famous population theorists of that time is Thomas Malthus. In 1798, Malthus proposes his own theory about population. match to him, human populations grow exponentially while food issue grows at an arithmetic rate. Thus, if the increase in our population is non controlled properly, then the arrive of the people would increase faster than the food supply. He stated that if this maturation rate is allowed to continue, it would lead to a food dearth. To solve this problem, he proposed one-third solutions. The first one is positive check. This method increases death rates receivable to wars, famines, disease , and natural disasters.Preventive or negative check is the other one. It lowers the deliver rate which is accomplished through abortion, birth control, and celibacy. The last one is honourable restraint which is refraining from marriage until the time when a person is capable of load-bearing(a) a family. This two hundred-year-old theory is now happening these days. It predicted the problems of food shortage that the world is experiencing today be catch of the uncontrolled increase in population. Still, I cannot richly agree with Malthus be name at that place are things that he forgot to take into consideration when he formulated this theory. One is the ability of man to increase the food production as stated by Marx. He failed to recognize mans ability to use science and technology to solve these population problems akin the possible developments in agricultural technology which can increases the supply of food. perhaps during that time, science is making a slow progress that he acquire we cannot remedy these problems. Another one is the use of birth control as a way of reducing population. He believed that having only few kids is the only way to stop or control the increasing growth rate. Moreover, he confused the desire for sexual relationships with the desire to have minorren. He didnt realize that a person can still engage in a sexual relationship and still dont have a child with the help of contraceptives. Although Malthus theory has some loopholes, the essentials of the theory have not yet been demolished. There are some assumptions that turned out to be true(p).RH billThe reproductive health bill which is now a law is the most controversial bill in the Philippines for decades which consider back to 1967. The bill is composed of topics which deal with issues about family planning, maternal and child health, and reproductive and sexual conditions. Its main objective is to lift the reproductive standards of Filipinos by promoting respect for li fe, informed choice, birth spacing and responsible parenthood which is unity with the human rights standards. It also guarantees access to medically-safe, legal and quality reproductive health care services and relevant information.Although it has promising merits, I do not support the bill because of some of its faulty assumptions. One is the assumption that overpopulation is the cause of destitution. In truth, there is really no relationship between overpopulation and scantiness but RH bill still insists that it is the cause of the worsening poverty in our country. It is true that it is one of the factors but it is never the root cause of poverty. What is the primary cause of poverty are the corruption and the bad brass section of the administration. In fact, we are one of the most corrupt countries in southeastward Asia.Another assumption is that Philippines is overpopulated. In reality, there is no overpopulation in our country. It is true that our cities are densely populat ed but in some separate of our country, there are small numbers of people and some are still uninhabited.One more problem in the bill is the spirit that contraceptives will prevent abortion and sexually transmitted diseases. We should not lead our safety to the use of these contraceptives in the prevention of STDs because according to some studies, there is no proof that condoms, for example, is effective in preventing STDs. In the case of abortions, it did not really change magnitude the incidents. According to a study in Spain, a 10-year period of an increasing use of contraceptive devises had been paralleled by a significantly increasing number of abortions.Though it is already a law, I rely that it can still be corrected so that it can in truth uplift the standards of living of the Filipino people and be the solution to lessen the countrys underemployment and booming population.